Caucus Blogs: Tastemakers in Iowa blog about the candidates.

DEM BLOGROLL

ADBRITE?

GOOGLE AD?
Democrat
Posted at November 4, 2007 at 10:00 pm

Excerpt:

This is noteworthy because Feingold usually votes for the President’s nominees because he says they should have the right to choose they work witht. In the past Feingold has voted in favor of John Aschcroft, John Roberts, and Condileeza Rice among others.

Here is Feingold’s statement on why he is not supporting Mukasey…

I will vote against the nomination of Judge Mukasey to be the next Attorney General. This was a difficult decision, as Judge Mukasey has many impressive qualities. He is intelligent and experienced and appears to understand the need to depoliticize the Department of Justice and restore its credibility and reputation.

At this point in our history, however, the country also needs an Attorney General who will tell the President that he cannot ignore the laws passed by Congress. Unfortunately, Judge Mukasey was unwilling to reject the extreme and dangerous theories of executive power that this administration has put forward.

The nation’s top law enforcement officer must be able to stand up to a chief executive who thinks he is above the law. The rule of law is too important to our country’s history and to its future to compromise on that bedrock principle.

Read more at Century of the Common Iowan.

Related Posts:

Feingold-Reid Bill to End War Funding be Voted on Tomorrow
Key Democrat Gives In Because Bush Stands Tough on Attorney General Nomination
Feingold Votes for Obama
Feingold to Introduce Censure of Bush, Cheney, and Gonzales
Wellstone and Feingold for Closing Fallon Loophole
Feingold, Russ Feingold
What Could Have Been

GOP BLOGROLL

ADBRITE?

GOOGLE AD?